How can we tell if PET imaging for cancer is cost effective?

Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):711-712, Michael P Mac Manus, Rodney J Hicks

Molecular imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), and more recently with PET–CT, provides accurate and detailed information on the extent and response to treatment for many common cancers. Despite its superiority over conventional imaging, FDG-PET availability and funding vary widely between developed countries. Different health-care providers reach widely different conclusions about the use of expensive PET scans to replace or supplement cheaper conventional...

NOT A MEMBER?

Registration is FREE

  • Up-to-date oncology news
  • Journal article summaries
  • Commentaries and interviews
  • Drug and interactions database
  • Chemotherapy regimens
  • Daily e-newsletters

 

Editors' Choice

Long-Term Posttransplant Bortezomib Boosts Outcome in Myeloma With del(17p13)

Sign up for our newsletters

Too busy to follow cancer's top stories? Sign-up for 1 or more of our free newsletters -- delivered weekly to your inbox.

Cancer Type

  • Bladder
  • Bone
  • Breast
  • Breast (ER-Positive)
  • CNS/Brain
  • Colon and Rectum
  • Endocrine System
  • Esophagus
  • GYN (Non-Ovary)
  • GYN (Ovary)
  • Head and Neck
  • Hodgkin's Lymphoma
  • Kidney (Renal Cell)
  • Leukemia
  • Liver and Bile Duct
  • Lung
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Myelodysplastic Syndrome
  • Myeloproliferative Diseases
  • Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
  • Pancreas
  • Pediatric Cancers
  • Prostate
  • Rare Cancers
  • Skin
  • Soft-Tissue Sarcoma
  • Stomach
  • Testicle
  • Forgot your password?
    Not a member? Free registration